Understanding People’s Experiences with Remote Provision of Medication Abortion
Funding Amount
Varies
Deadline
Deadline not published
Grant Type
Foundation
Can we apply?
Check your organization against each line. Taken from the listing; confirm with the funder's guidelines.
Eligible organizations
- Organizations on behalf of a named principal investigator (PI)
Required status
- Tax-exempt status
Other requirements
- _You can learn more about this opportunity by visiting the funder's [website](https://societyfp.org/grantmaking/funding-opportunities/)._
- Applicants do not need to be members of the Society
- Funding is limited to projects focused on the US
Not eligible / not funded
- Not eligible: Please note that projects exploring remote provision of medication abortion from the perspective of hypothetical abortion seekers, clinicians, or institutions will not be supported via this funding opportunity
- Not eligible: Further, due to the [evidence](https://societyfp.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/SFP_ScienceSays_Template-TelehealthMedicationAbortion-f.pdf) already in hand, studies on safety and efficacy will not be supported
Overview
Purpose
Remote provision of medication abortion – a safe and effective method of abortion care – rapidly expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic and has continued to grow in the wake of the Dobbs decision and the introduction of shield laws. Today, 20% of all abortions in the US are provided remotely via a wide range of service delivery structures.
In order to deepen our understanding of people’s experiences with this model of care in the current context and ensure that their experiences are centered, the Society of Family Planning is offering the Understanding people’s experiences with remote provision of medication abortion funding opportunity. The purpose of this funding opportunity is to generate evidence that can be used to support the provision and delivery of person-centered abortion care.
Research Focus
We invite research proposals focused on understanding the experiences of people who have accessed medication abortion remotely in the current healthcare landscape; for purposes of this funding opportunity, this is defined as the remote dispensing of mifepristone and/or misoprostol by a health professional functioning within their licensed scope of practice.
Proposals are welcome to explore questions related but not limited to:
- How do people’s experiences align with their expectations, needs, preferences, and/or values?
- How does social location shape people’s experiences, with specific attention to racial and ethnic identity?
- How does cost shape people’s experiences?
- How do state and/or federal policies shape people’s experiences?
- How do different service delivery modalities shape people’s experiences?
Central to this funding opportunity is the understanding that access to abortion is not equitable and people’s social locations (eg, race, ethnicity, religion, social class, gender, age, health, and geography) shape their abortion experiences. As such, proposed research must specifically define and justify the population the research is focused on and bring attention to how social location shapes that population’s experience with abortion. Further, given the range of ways in which medication abortion can be delivered remotely (eg, synchronous or asynchronous communication, hybrid or direct-to-patient models, level of clinician interaction, process for receiving medications, management of follow up care), proposals must bring specificity to the service delivery structure(s) included in their research. Finally, cost of care and relevant state and/or federal policies must be explicitly addressed even if not the focus of the proposal.
Proposed research must be positioned to produce empirical evidence with a clear, concrete, and strategic path to changes in clinical practice, health service delivery, and/or other structures that support person-centered abortion care. Teams must be attentive to the Society’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Vision Statement throughout the research process. If proposed research uses data related to race and racism, projects must name and analyze the pathways through which structural racism affects people’s care experiences and be attentive to recommendations00223-3/fulltext) for working with these data.
Funds and Duration
We invite proposals for research studies with budgets up to $500,000 that can be completed within 24 months of award. Please note that we seek to fund studies with a range of budgets within the budget maximum: concretely, we anticipate supporting up to three projects with larger budgets (eg, up to $500,000) and up to six projects with smaller budgets (eg, up to $100,000), such as pilot studies, secondary data analysis, or qualitative studies.
Funding is also available to cover processing fees associated with two open- access publications, provided the work is published within two years of grant completion. During the award period, the Society will provide grantees with technical assistance around data security and risk mitigation.
Eligibility
_You can learn more about this opportunity by visiting the funder's website._
- Grants are limited, without exception, to tax-exempt organizations.
- Grants will be made to organizations on behalf of a named principal investigator (PI).
- Proof of the agency/institution’s tax-exempt status determination letter must be included.
- Applicants do not need to be members of the Society.
- Funding is limited to projects focused on the US.
Ineligibility
- Please note that projects exploring remote provision of medication abortion from the perspective of hypothetical abortion seekers, clinicians, or institutions will not be supported via this funding opportunity.
- Further, due to the evidence already in hand, studies on safety and efficacy will not be supported.
What Society of Family Planning actually gave
Source: IRS Form 990-PF, 2025
- Grants in 2025
- 61
- Total given
- $4.49M
- Median grant
- $54K
- Range
- $400–$723K
- By dollars: California 22%, Massachusetts 11%, Illinois 10%. Top recipient cities: Los Angeles, CA; Philadelphia, PA; Washington, DC.
- 5% of grants with a stated purpose were for general or operating support.
Example grants
Regents of the University of California SF · Los Angeles, CA
Emerging scholars
$723K
University of Washington · Chicago, IL
Emerging scholars
$436K
University of Texas at Austin · Austin, TX
Emerging scholars
$243K
Ibis Reproductive Health Inc · Cambridge, MA
Remote provision of medication abortion
$240K
University of Maryland · College Park, MD
Emerging scholars
$225K
Focus Areas & Funding Uses
Fields of Work
- Reproductive health
- Science research
Categories
Browse similar grants by category
Related Grants
Open grants from this funder and similar programs
Documenting the Impact of US Policy and Legal Stressors on Contraceptive Care Grant
Society of Family Planning
Amount
Up to US $150,000
Deadline
Deadline not published
Documenting the Composition of Clinicians Providing Abortion Care Grant
Society of Family Planning
Amount
Up to US $75,000
Deadline
Deadline not published
Bridging Investments in Abortion and Contraception Research Grant
Society of Family Planning
Amount
Up to US $100,000
Deadline
Deadline not published
Understanding People’s Experiences with and Preferences for Post-Abortion Contraceptive Care
Society of Family Planning
Amount
Varies
Deadline
Deadline not published
Contraceptive Misinformation and Disinformation Grant
Society of Family Planning
Amount
Up to US $150,000
Deadline
Deadline not published
Reproductive Scientist Development Program Grant
March of Dimes Inc
Amount
Up to US $250,000
Deadline
Deadline not published
Ready to apply for Understanding People’s Experiences with Remote Provision of Medication Abortion?
Grantable helps you assess fit, draft narratives, and track deadlines — so you can submit stronger applications, faster.
You found Understanding People’s Experiences with Remote Provision of Medication Abortion. Now let's win it.