Free template · Word & Google Docs

Free grant proposal template, with a sample proposal

A grant writing template that walks you through every section funders expect, from the executive summary to the budget narrative. Each section has guidance on what reviewers look for, questions to answer and placeholders to fill in. Below it, a complete sample grant proposal shows each section done well, with notes on why it works.

  • ✓ 10 sections plus a cover sheet and attachments checklist
  • ✓ Tables for objectives, timeline, evaluation and budget
  • ✓ Guidance boxes you delete before sending
  • ✓ Works for foundation, corporate and government proposals

What’s in the grant proposal template

The sections follow the order most foundations and government funders use. If a funder gives its own outline or questions, follow theirs: the content carries over, only the order changes.

SectionWhat it answersTypical length
1. Cover letterWho is asking, for how much, and why this funder1 page (optional)
2. Executive summaryThe whole proposal in one paragraph200–300 words
3. Organization backgroundWhy you can deliver½–1 page
4. Statement of needThe problem, with local evidence1–2 pages
5. Goals and objectivesWhat will change, measurably, by whenTable
6. Project design and timelineWhat you’ll do, who does it, when1–3 pages
7. Evaluation planHow you’ll know it worked½–1 page
8. Budget and budget narrativeWhat it costs and whyFunder’s form
9. SustainabilityHow the work continues after the grant½ page
10. ConclusionThe ask, restated, and thanks1 paragraph

The file also includes a cover sheet (legal name, EIN, contact, amount, project period) and a checklist of the attachments funders ask for most: IRS determination letter, board list, budgets, financial statements, letters of support and staff bios.

Sample grant proposal, section by section

An example of a grant proposal for a nonprofit: Harbor Bend Reads asks the Harbor Bend Community Foundation for $42,262 toward a $69,822 Summer Reading Initiative. The organization, funder, people and figures are fictional; the structure and the reasoning are what to copy. The budget matches the example in our grant budget template.

200–300 words

Executive summary

The whole proposal in one paragraph: who, what, for whom, how much, and what changes.

Harbor Bend Reads requests $42,262 from the Harbor Bend Community Foundation to run the Summer Reading Initiative for 150 students in grades 2–5 at three Harbor Bend elementary schools from June 2027 to May 2028. Fifty-eight percent of third graders in the district read below grade level, and students who lose ground over the summer rarely make it up in the fall.

Four trained reading coaches will lead small-group tutoring four days a week through the summer and twice a week after school during the year, with six family reading nights. By May 2028, at least 70% of participating students will gain one or more reading levels, measured by pre- and post-assessments. The total project cost is $69,822; the school district contributes classroom space and a community tech fund provides assessment tablets.

Why this works
  • The amount, the number of students, the place and the dates all appear in the first sentence.
  • One local number frames the need; the full case comes later.
  • It ends on a measurable result and the total cost, so a reviewer knows the request is part of a funded whole.
Half a page to a page

Organization background

Why you can deliver: history, mission, who you serve, results, and who will lead.

Harbor Bend Reads was founded in 2014 by retired teachers to help every child in Harbor Bend read at grade level by the end of third grade. Each year we serve about 400 students through in-school tutoring, a summer program and a free book exchange.

In the 2025–26 school year, 68% of students in our in-school tutoring gained at least one reading level. Program Director Dana Morales, a former reading specialist with 12 years in the district, will lead the initiative and supervise the coaches.

Why this works
  • It sticks to the history and results that matter for this project instead of listing every program.
  • The results use the same measure as this project’s objectives (reading levels gained), so the target looks credible.
  • Naming the lead and their experience answers the capacity question before it’s asked.
One to two pages

Statement of need

The problem, for these people, in this place, and why now, with evidence.

In spring 2025, 58% of third graders in the Harbor Bend school district scored below grade level on the state reading assessment, compared with 44% statewide. At the three schools in this project, where more than 80% of students qualify for free or reduced-price meals, the figure was 67%.

Summer makes the gap wider. Teachers at these schools estimate that students lose four to six weeks of reading progress over the break, and only one of the three schools offers any summer programming. Families told us in our 2025 survey that the main barriers are cost, transportation and a lack of books at home.

“My son loved the library program, but it ended when the bus route was cut,” one parent wrote. The Summer Reading Initiative brings tutoring to the schools students already attend, at no cost, with books they can keep.

Why this works
  • Local data with a source and year, compared with a benchmark so the size of the gap is clear.
  • It describes the community’s need, not the organization’s need for money.
  • The quote shows the barrier the project removes, so the design in the next sections reads as the obvious answer.
A goal plus two or three SMART objectives

Goals and objectives

The change you want, broken into specific, measurable, time-bound targets.

Goal: Students in grades 2–5 at three Harbor Bend elementary schools read at or closer to grade level.

ObjectiveMeasureTargetBy when
Students gain reading levelsPre/post leveled reading assessment70% gain 1+ levelMay 2028
Students attend consistentlyAttendance records80% attend 75% of sessionsAug 2027 and May 2028
Families read at homeFamily survey60% report reading together 3+ times a weekMay 2028
Why this works
  • The goal is broad; each objective names who changes, by how much, how it’s measured and by when.
  • Attendance is a leading indicator: if it slips, the team knows early that outcomes are at risk.
  • Every objective reappears in the evaluation plan, which is what reviewers check.
One to three pages

Project design and timeline

What you’ll do, step by step, who does it, and why this approach works.

Teachers refer students reading one or more levels below grade. Coaches work with groups of four to six students for 45 minutes, four mornings a week for six weeks in the summer and two afternoons a week during the school year, using leveled readers matched to each group. Every student takes home a book bag and a reading journal, and six family reading nights show parents simple ways to read together.

Small-group, leveled instruction is the approach our in-school program already uses, and it is well supported in early-literacy research. The school district provides classrooms at no cost, which removes the transportation barrier families named in our survey.

ActivityLeadStartEnd
Hire and train coaches; schedule classroomsProgram DirectorJun 2027Jun 2027
Summer tutoring (6 weeks)Reading coachesJul 2027Aug 2027
School-year tutoring and family nightsReading coachesSep 2027May 2028
Assessments, analysis and final reportAssessment consultantJun 2027May 2028
Why this works
  • A reviewer can picture a typical week: group size, session length, frequency and place.
  • It says why the approach works (the organization’s own results plus research) without a literature review.
  • The partner’s contribution is concrete, and it ties back to a barrier named in the need statement.
Half a page to a page

Evaluation plan

How you’ll know the objectives were met, and what you’ll do with the results.

ObjectiveIndicatorToolWhenWho
Reading gainsReading levels gainedLeveled reading assessmentJune, August, MayAssessment consultant
Attendance% of sessions attendedSign-in recordsWeeklyReading coaches
Home readingReading-together frequencyFamily surveySeptember and MayProgram Director

Results will be shared with the Foundation in a mid-year update and a final report, and with partner schools each term. Coaches review attendance weekly and follow up with families after two missed sessions.

Why this works
  • One row per objective, with the tool, timing and a named owner.
  • It separates outcomes (reading gains) from outputs (attendance) and tracks both.
  • It says how the data will be used, not only collected.
The funder’s form, plus a line-by-line justification

Budget and budget narrative

What it costs, how you calculated it, and who else is paying.

CategoryRequestedOther sourcesTotal
Personnel (salaries and fringe)$25,776$20,160$45,936
Contractors and consultants$3,600—$3,600
Travel$1,680—$1,680
Supplies and materials$6,000—$6,000
Participant support$1,500—$1,500
Equipment—$2,400$2,400
Rent and facilities (in-kind)—$5,000$5,000
Indirect costs (10% of MTDC)$3,706—$3,706
Total$42,262$27,560$69,822

Reading coaches: four part-time coaches × 400 hours × $16.25/hour = $26,000, plus 8% payroll taxes ($2,080). We request 60% ($16,848); the district’s after-school fund covers the rest. Leveled reader sets: 120 sets × $35 = $4,200, reused in future years.

Why this works
  • Every line traces back to an activity in the project design.
  • The narrative shows the math (quantity × unit cost, hours × rate), which is what reviewers look for.
  • Cost share and in-kind support are visible, so the request reads as part of a funded whole.
Half a page

Sustainability

How the work continues after the grant, with named sources.

The largest one-time costs, reader sets and coach training, carry into future years. The school district has agreed to keep providing classrooms, and we will include the school-year tutoring in our 2028 request to the district’s after-school fund. Summer costs will move into our annual individual-giving campaign, which raised $165,000 last year.

Why this works
  • It separates one-time costs from ongoing ones.
  • Each ongoing cost has a named source, instead of “we will continue to seek funding.”
One paragraph

Conclusion

Restate the need, what the grant makes possible, and thank the funder.

With the Foundation’s support, 150 Harbor Bend students will spend next summer reading instead of falling behind, and their families will leave with books and habits that last. Thank you for considering this request. Dana Morales, Program Director, can answer any questions at dana@harborbendreads.example or 555-0110.

Why this works
  • Short, specific and warm. It ends with a named contact.

How to use the template

  1. Start from the funder’s guidelines. List every required section, question, word limit and attachment, and note how the proposal will be scored. Reorder the template’s sections to match.
  2. Build the budget early. The numbers shape the project design. Our grant budget template totals your costs and drafts the budget narrative.
  3. Fill in the sections in this order: need, goals and objectives, project design, evaluation, budget, sustainability, background. Write the executive summary and the cover letter last.
  4. Delete the guidance: the shaded boxes, the question lists and any leftover placeholders. Then check it against the funder’s requirements one last time.
  5. Save your best sections as boilerplate. The background, mission and program descriptions carry into the next proposal with light edits.

Common grant proposal mistakes

  • Ignoring the funder’s outline, questions or word limits in favor of your own format.

  • A need statement about your organization’s budget gap instead of the community’s problem.

  • Objectives that can’t be measured (“improve literacy”) or don’t reappear in the evaluation plan.

  • Budget lines with no activity in the narrative, or activities with no line in the budget.

  • Round-number budgets with no math behind them.

  • A sustainability section that only says “we will continue to seek funding.”

Templates for the pieces around the proposal: a letter of inquiry, a cover letter and a logic model. More on letters of support.

Draft it from your own documents

A template gives you the structure. You still have to fill every section, match it to the funder and check it against their rules. Grantable is an AI workspace that does the first pass with you:

  • Upload the funder’s guidelines and Grantable turns them into a checklist: deadline, required sections with word limits, attachments and scoring criteria.
  • It drafts each section from your organization’s profile and boilerplate, in your voice, including a budget narrative when the funder asks for one.
  • A review pass checks the draft for missing sections, word limits, unsupported claims and budget lines the narrative doesn’t justify, before you submit.

You edit and decide what goes out. Free to start.

Grant proposal questions

What should a grant proposal include?

Most grant proposals include an executive summary, organization background, statement of need, goals and objectives, project design with a timeline, an evaluation plan, a budget with a budget narrative, a sustainability plan and a short conclusion, plus attachments such as your IRS determination letter, board list and financial statements. Many funders also want a cover letter. Always check the funder’s guidelines first: if they give an outline or specific questions, answer those in their order.

How long should a grant proposal be?

As long as the funder allows, and no longer. Many foundation proposals run 5 to 10 pages; letters of inquiry are 2 to 3 pages; federal applications can run much longer with strict page limits per section. When no limit is given, aim for a half-page executive summary, one to two pages on the need, and one to three pages on the project design.

What is the format of a grant proposal?

Follow the funder’s format exactly: their section order, word or page limits, font and margins, and file type. Without instructions, use clear headings for each section, 11 or 12 point type, one-inch margins and tables for objectives, timeline, evaluation and budget. Online portals often replace the document with a form; paste each section into its matching field.

What is the difference between a grant proposal and a letter of inquiry?

A letter of inquiry (LOI) is a short, two-to-three page summary sent first to see whether a funder wants a full proposal. The proposal is the complete application: the full need statement, project design, evaluation plan and budget. Many foundations ask for an LOI first and invite full proposals only from the strongest.

Is there a free grant proposal template for Google Docs?

Yes. Use “Make a copy in Google Docs” at the top of this page to get your own editable copy in Google Drive. The Word version works too: upload it to Drive and open it with Google Docs. The headings, tables, guidance boxes and placeholders carry over.

Can AI write a grant proposal?

AI can draft sections quickly, but a strong proposal needs your organization’s real results, data and voice, and a person to check every claim. It works best when it drafts from your own documents and the funder’s guidelines, and you edit. Our guide to whether AI can write grant proposals covers what to automate and what to keep human.