Russell Sage Foundation logo

RSF: Future of Work Grant Program

Russell Sage Foundation

Funding Amount

Up to US $75,000

Deadline

October 28, 2026

Listed date — confirm with the funder

Grant Type

Foundation

Deadline history & next window

Cycle
Twice a year
Current deadline
October 28, 2026
Tracked since
April 2026

Source: the cycle recorded on this listing. Confirm dates with the funder.

Can we apply?

Check your organization against each line. Taken from the listing; confirm with the funder's guidelines.

Other requirements

  • All applicants (both PIs and Co-PIs) must have a doctorate.
  • In rare circumstances, RSF may consider applications from scholars who do not hold a doctorate but can demonstrate a strong career background that establishes their ability to conduct high-level, peer-reviewed scholarly research.

Not eligible / not funded

  • Not eligible: Our guidelines restrict us from funding pre-doctoral study or research, and we do not give scholarships or other types of grants for support of college funding.
  • Not eligible: As a general rule, we do not provide tuition reimbursements.
  • Not eligible: Residential fellowships elsewhere
  • Not eligible: We do not make general support grants to other institutions; only specific research project grants that further our declared program goals are permitted.
  • Not eligible: The foundation does not typically provide support for conferences and workshops independent of a specific project and affiliated grant.
  • Not eligible: In some rare cases, we will consider providing partial support for a specific research conference that furthers the goals of the foundation.
  • Not eligible: Open-ended conferences will not be considered.

Overview

The Russell Sage Foundation's Future of Work Grant Program seeks innovative research proposals that explore the impact of job quality changes on low- and moderately paid workers in the U.S. The program emphasizes studies on employer practices, labor market dynamics, and public policies. It prioritizes projects utilizing new data or unique methods, focusing on issues like job automation, labor market shifts post-COVID-19, and the effects of emerging technologies on workforce wellbeing.

The Russell Sage Foundation’s program on the Future of Work supports innovative research on the causes and consequences of changes in the quality of jobs for low- and moderately paid workers and their families in the U.S. We seek investigator-initiated research proposals that will broaden our understanding of the role of changes in employer practices, the nature of the labor market and public policies on employment, earnings, and job quality. We are especially interested in proposals that address questions about the interplay of market and non-market forces in shaping the wellbeing of workers.
RSF prioritizes analyses that make use of newly available data or demonstrate novel uses of existing data. We support original data collection when a project is focused on important program priorities, projects that conduct survey or field experiments and qualitative studies. RSF encourages methodological variety and inter-disciplinary collaboration. Proposed projects must have well-developed conceptual frameworks and rigorous research designs. Analytical models must be well-specified and research methods must be appropriate.
RSF priorities do not include analyses of health or mental health outcomes or health behaviors as these are priorities for other funders. For the same reason, RSF seldom supports studies focused on educational processes or curricular issues but does prioritize analyses of inequalities in student achievement or educational attainment
The kinds of topics and questions of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Emerging Technologies and the Future of Work and Workers

What are the effects of emerging technologies (including advanced communication systems, industrial robots, flexible manufacturing systems, computer-assisted design and manufacturing, and artificial intelligence-mediated decision making) on worker productivity, employment, employer decision-making, job skills, and labor-management relations? How do these effects vary with workers’ education, race/ethnicity, gender, immigration status, region, industry?
When does automation contribute to replacement (or substitution) of human decision-making and when does it enhance it?
How does reliance on algorithms in hiring and promotion affect opportunities for low-income workers?
Can newly available data, such as those obtained through online employment sites, help us better understand changes in occupations, job skill requirements, hiring biases, or labor market shifts?
“The Big Shift”? Changes in Labor Force Participation and Increased Turnover During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic
To what extent have concerns about workplace health and safety issues, family pressures due to schooling and daycare uncertainty, remote work options, spatial relocation of workers, and changes in the meaning of work contributed to increased labor force exits and reduced entrances post-pandemic?
Even though the economy has recovered from the pandemic-induced job losses, many workers are searching for new or different jobs. What factors have contributed to this shift?
Has the pandemic changed workers’ perceptions about their work environment (e.g., remote work, flexible schedules, compensation)?
To what extent did pandemic relief, expanded unemployment benefits, rent moratoria, student-loan forgiveness, and other public policy changes contribute to increased quits and reduced labor force participation?
What changes in employer practices are likely to emerge from their experiences during the pandemic? To what extent will firms increase wages and job quality and to what extent will they accelerate the adoption of labor-saving technologies?
To what extent has the pandemic encouraged union members to strike and nonunion members, including independent contractors, to seek to form unions or other forms of workplace representation or to otherwise pursue workplace changes?
How does working from home affect worker wellbeing and productivity?
How has the growth in remote work affected the geography of work, firms’ use of low and moderately paid workers and their reliance on independent contractors?
To what extent does working from home contribute to (or interfere with) work-life balance? How do any effects vary with workers’ education, race/ethnicity, gender, immigration status, region, industry?
Labor Market Power and Institutions
How have changes in the availability of stable jobs at good wages affected the likelihood that the children of working-class parents will graduate from college and/or move into the middle-class? How do these effects vary by race/ethnicity/immigration status/gender?
How do perceptions about the workplace vary for workers with and without a college degree, women versus male workers, white workers versus workers of color?
How might alternative governance structures affect the balance of power in employment relations? To what extent do labor organizing and collective action improve worker voice and labor market outcomes?
What are the employment and wage effects of recent minimum wage increases on diverse groups of workers across industries and occupations and in various parts of the country?
What has been the effect of mergers, inter-firm and noncompete agreements on labor market competition and wages?
What are the causes and consequences of employer concentration of corporate power and their effects on employment and wages?
What is the role of public policy in the amelioration of failures of labor market competition?
How does the fissuring of the workplace impact the structure of the labor market and what are the implications for the preservation of middle-class jobs?
Workforce Development, Training, and the 21st Century American Workplace
To what extent do labor market intermediaries, such as community colleges, temporary employment agencies, social service providers, and labor unions, promote job mobility and opportunity?
When is re-training appropriate and effective? What policies have been effective for developing the skills of workers over the course of their careers?
How do employers experience and respond to the challenges posed by technology, globalization, and demographic changes in the workforce?
Changes in Employer Practices and Alternative Work Arrangements
How have changes in the incidence of nonstandard work arrangements, firm-to-firm contracting, and new business models that concentrate workers with similar skills levels in the same firm (sometimes known as “fissuring”) affected wage and nonwage compensation and other aspects of job quality? How have these effects varied by demographic group and contributed to the growth in inequality?
To what degree do low- and moderate-income individuals turn to independent contracting or informal, nonemployee work arrangements to make ends meet? Has sporadic reliance on these types of work risen recently, and if so, why?
The types of intermediated employment—which include temporary help firms, other contract firms, managed service providers, vendor services management, and online platforms—have grown in recent years. How do these arrangements affect the way firms recruit workers and their wages and benefits, employment, and longer-term career opportunities?
With the difficulty businesses face in recruiting workers and, in some areas, the adoption of scheduling regulations, how have firms changed their practices to make work hours more predictable and stable? What are major barriers to changing scheduling practices?
What kinds of data and partnerships (inter-agency and other) could clarify the scope of worker misclassification and inform enforcement?
Changing Economies, Changing Families and Policy Responses
What have been the effects of recent work-family legislation in cities and states on employers, workers, and families, and how do they affect racial and gender inequalities?
What changes in employer practices and government policies can foster flexible working conditions at good wages?
To what extent have the demands and culture of the contemporary workplace affected working parents’ ability to maintain work-life balance?
Use of FundingFunding can be used for:

  • research assistance, data acquisition, data analysis, and investigator time for conducting research and writing up results.
  • Grant Award

Trustee Grants are capped at $200,000, including 15% indirect costs, over a two-year period. Presidential Awards are capped at $50,000 (no indirect costs) over a two-year period. However, when research projects have special needs for gathering data (e.g., qualitative research or survey experiments), gaining access to proprietary or restricted-use data, or when the proposal budget includes salary support for multiple assistant professor PIs, applicants may request up to $75,000 (no indirect costs).

Eligibility

All applicants (both PIs and Co-PIs) must have a doctorate. In rare circumstances, RSF may consider applications from scholars who do not hold a doctorate but can demonstrate a strong career background that establishes their ability to conduct high-level, peer-reviewed scholarly research.

Ineligibility

Our guidelines restrict us from funding pre-doctoral study or research, and we do not give scholarships or other types of grants for support of college funding.As a general rule, we do not provide tuition reimbursements.We do not fund residential fellowships elsewhere. We do not make general support grants to other institutions; only specific research project grants that further our declared program goals are permitted.The foundation does not typically provide support for conferences and workshops independent of a specific project and affiliated grant.In some rare cases, we will consider providing partial support for a specific research conference that furthers the goals of the foundation. Open-ended conferences will not be considered.

How to Apply

Submit a letter of inquiry through RSF's Fluxx application portal by October 28, 2026, 2 p.m. ET. About 15% of LOIs are invited to submit a full proposal (due February 22, 2027); funding decisions June 2027, grants start on or after September 1, 2027.

Past recipients of this program

Recent awards under this program (from Russell Sage Foundation's IRS filings)

3 grants in Russell Sage Foundation's 2020–2023 filings reference “Future of Work Grant Program” in their stated purpose. Amounts and places as reported by the funder.

What Russell Sage Foundation actually gave

Source: IRS Form 990-PF, 2025

Grants in 2025
137
Total given
$6.41M
Median grant
$38K
Range
$1,671–$117K
  • By dollars: California 22%, New York 16%, District of Columbia 9%. Top recipient cities: New York, NY; Washington, DC; Chicago, IL.
  • 0% of grants with a stated purpose were for general or operating support.
  • 21% of recipients were new grantees, not repeat recipients.

Example grants

  • North Carolina State University · Raleigh, NC

    Police exposure and socioeconomic well-being among african american men

    $117K

  • Brookings Institution · Washington, DC

    Can transfer pathways promote diversity after the 2023 supreme court deci

    $109K

  • National Academy of Sciences · Washington, DC

    Global forced migration and u.s. resettlement

    $100K

  • Stanford University · Stanford, CA

    A public platform for open mixed-methods research

    $100K

  • University of California Los Angeles · Los Angeles, CA

    Political solidarity and political action among people of color

    $100K

IRS Form 990-PF, 2025. Amounts as reported by the funder. Full 990 history →

Focus Areas & Funding Uses

Fields of Work

  • Workforce development
  • Science research

Categories

Browse similar grants by category

Related Grants

Open grants from this funder and similar programs

Your AI grants department

Ready to apply for RSF: Future of Work Grant Program?

Grantable helps you assess fit, draft narratives, and track deadlines — so you can submit stronger applications, faster.

You found RSF: Future of Work Grant Program. Now let's win it.

Start writing